Talk:Antoinette

From BelegarthWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Unknown: new section)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
P.S.  Hmm, on second thought, perhaps it's for entries that don't exactly add value to the wiki (to put it politely), but we don't want to delete?  Anyway, what are your thoughts for the category?  I don't think it's intended for pages which happen to be tongue-in-cheek (Knights of Wildwood perhaps being a good example).
 
P.S.  Hmm, on second thought, perhaps it's for entries that don't exactly add value to the wiki (to put it politely), but we don't want to delete?  Anyway, what are your thoughts for the category?  I don't think it's intended for pages which happen to be tongue-in-cheek (Knights of Wildwood perhaps being a good example).
 +
 +
== Unknown ==
 +
 +
Nope, I have no idea why we still have it. I would ask Derian. Also, you know I have an email you could have emailed this too right?

Latest revision as of 01:06, 20 March 2018

Hey Antoinette. Do you know why we still have a "Category:Blank/Joke Entries"? I was trying to figure out why blank & joke were combined, and seems like the only reason is because it's for "joke" pages which shouldn't be on the wiki, not pages that happen to be funny/jokes/historical.

Thoughts? I think if we want to keep it, it should be changed to "Category:Blank" (Or Category:Blank Entries, or something similar.) ~ Rasheab

P.S. Hmm, on second thought, perhaps it's for entries that don't exactly add value to the wiki (to put it politely), but we don't want to delete? Anyway, what are your thoughts for the category? I don't think it's intended for pages which happen to be tongue-in-cheek (Knights of Wildwood perhaps being a good example).

[edit] Unknown

Nope, I have no idea why we still have it. I would ask Derian. Also, you know I have an email you could have emailed this too right?

Personal tools
For Fighters
For Craftsman
Leadership